Skip to main content

5 wargaming mechanics that I dislike

 1. Command Radius. Ok, it may work if there is only one general (like in DBA), but this business of each commander having his own radius as if it is a shouting contest... Wally Simon debunked it long ago better than I could: "There was only one way Kris could maintain control of his entire division, keeping them all within his magical 3 inch radius, and that was to continually scrunch all six units together in one solid mass, cavalry, infantry and artillery [...] There are many gaming ploys that deal with command response functions, systems that supposedly reproduce the difficulties of commanders keeping their forces under their control, and, in my considered opinion, the 'mysterious aura' ploy is probably the worst of them all"  (PW Review May 1999) Guilty party example: Grande Armée.

2. Rerolls. The kind of rerolls that bother me are not those tied to some mechanic but what I call the insert-coin reroll. You start the battle with X rerolls and you may use them whenever you like. Guilty party example: Midgard

3. Gotcha Cards. "I'm charging". "No, you are not charging, mate. I've got a card! Goootcha!!"  This may be fun for some, but I take a pass. Besides, this kind of games do not solo well. Guilty party example: Never Mind the Billhooks

4. Side boards. Quite popular recently, but if I'm playing a game I like to be looking at the table and figures not at a piece of cardboard that resembles an old telephone switchboard. Guilty party example: Saga

5. Playing Cards on the table. Your battle may end up looking like a low-stakes Vegas blackjack table.  Guilty party example: To The Strongest!

This is all highly personal and opinionated, of course! 



Comments

  1. I don't mind most of those mechanics but rerolls of any sort really seem to bother me. I tend to convert most of them to a +1 modifier if just using a d6. rerolls slow down the game!

    Any funny you should mention Wally Simon - i am just about to start rereading all his books. i got them all years ago and thought it was time to reacquaint myself.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wally Simon was bursting with ideas. Somehow they never coalesced into a structured ruleset but they were brilliant. Well worth the reread!

      Delete
  2. Top list. I am with you on all of those!
    Sadly, there are many more in the seemingly endless drive by games' designers to look clever and make some innovative way for players to be stuffed up, rather than just letting 'em stuff it up all by themselves. (Unfortunately this focus on pure game aspects seems to mean that historicity goes out the window at the same time...).
    Best wishes, James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So true. Historicity + relatively simple mechanics is the Holy Grail. That's why I like reading rulesets form old school wargamers. Most were very well versed in history, without forgetting that the game must flow.

      Delete
  3. Just out of curiosity, what's your alternative to command radius?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Parsecs From Home (1e) Week 1

Fleeing from the brutal crackdown decreed by governor Mantis on people that are not up on their taxes, our drifters ( see session 0 ) meet in a back alley of the mega-city Nemain. They don't want to be pressed on the local guard to make up for their debt. They read on each others eyes the fear of being at the end of the rope. Sakir, a paranoid and resourceful enforcer tasked by a fringe religious group to scout the galaxy for ancient artifacts, suggests to the pair a temporary refuge. He knows the location of an Ashtari Cult den. After all, they also worship artifacts and their religion is in good terms with Sakir's fringe cult. The other two agree. Mostly to rest for a while and also for the chance to sample the infamous gasses that the Ashatari inhale to have visions of archeological sites. Sakir Once in the den they relax. Perhaps a little too much. Echo, the quiet and lethal bounty hunter, wrecks a sofa with her power claw while whole-body-shaking enthralled by the drug. An...

One-hour Simplicity - Bridgehead (scenario 5)

A contested river crossing is one of the hardest situations in warfare. I present scenario 5 from the book One-Hour Wargames , but resolved using another Neil Thomas' ruleset called Simplicity in Practice (SiP). For adaptation notes see my first battlerep with this combo HERE .   The objective of the scenario for BLUE is to consolidate a bridgehead north of the river The composition of the armies is: BLUE: 4 infantry, 1 skirmishers, 1 cavalry RED: 3 infantry, 1 skirmishers, 2 cavalry Blue will arrive along the road and Red piecemeal at three random points: west of the woods, on the road and east of the hill.   At the start BLUE has a single unit north of the river: shadowy voltigeurs  have taken the woods. The first RED units show up west of the woods Since cavalry cannot enter the woods, they take a tortuous route around them. Unseen, the lurking skirmishers take aim BLUE cavalry crosses the bridge benefiting from a road move of 30cm.  In a river crossing, Space i...