Skip to main content

Posts

Backporting Neil Thomas 19th century rules to the Napoleonic era

   I like the rules in the book Wargaming: Nineteenth Century Europe 1815-1878 so much that I'm thinking of backporting them some years earlier to use them also in the Napoleonic period. However, I would like to do it with the minimum fuss and changes that break the elegance of the original. So far I'm considering two key areas:   1 Cavalry is not to be so much dissuaded from charging. 2 Close-order infantry in column formation needs an extra oomph when defending against Cavalry. Often it was trivial to turn the column into what was effectively a square.   These are the two rule changes I have in mind at the moment for each area. Thoughts welcomed.    1. Infantry charged by Cavalry or Dragoons needs to pass a morale test for the sole purpose of using defensive fire (no base loss). If they fail, the only consequence is that there's no defensive fire, and therefore no morale test for the Cavalry for being shot at. This simulates the sheer terror and confusion of being charge

When Nightmares Come (Osprey)

Team for 'When Nightmares Come' X-Files setting: Mulder, Scully,  a SWAT element and a couple of conspiracy weirdos.   

Random Movement Variant for One-Hour Wargames

This variant uses up to three average dice* to randomize movement distances for Neil Thomas' rules. *(dice with the faces numbered: 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5) The advantages of doing this are that you cannot predict things mechanically ('in three turns I'll get the skirmishers to those woods'). Charges also become more thrilling as you are not 100% certain that you can make contact and reach that exposed flank this turn. For the Horse & Musket period the randomized movement is: Infantry and Artillery: Sum of two Average dice - 1 Skirmishers: Sum of two Average dice + 2 Cavalry: Sum of three Average dice + 1 Note that the most likely results still are 6", 9" and 12", but you get a whole range of possible results. *How to convert a normal die to an average die. Using white dice for example, take white paint and fill in the 2 center pips on the six, this now becomes a 4. Now take black paint or a marker and add two pips to the one side to make it into a 3. Now y

Battle over Britain series

 Classic dogfight match-up (Spitfire Vs ME-109E) in a game from the Battle over Britain series from Minden Games. Volume 5, Tally Ho! (2018) is the one with more scenarios and it includes the base rules, although I think a re-release is coming named Dogfight! The game models very well the differences between planes with minimal rules overhead. Gary Graber knows his stuff!  As it stands, it is a wonderfully fun and quick 2-player game (especially with the 7 or 13 games campaign).   Tally Ho comes with solitaire rules, but I find them somehow lacking. I am working on alternatives solo rules and this afternoon I had a chance to test them.  

Long Range Recon Patrol

Long Range Recon Patrol, by Mike Lambo. The elements that make it such a good reconnaissance solo game are:  It creates a thrilling narrative each time. There are many decisions to be made because the different dice results overlap several possible orders. It has several push-your-luck mechanisms: do we fast move in a jungle? Risk entering a village? Force a river crossing?

Adjutant Introuvable - 2nd edition

  Quite an event in solo wargaming: the recent release of the 2nd version of Adjutant Introuvable (AI).  Even after a cursory glance, there's no denying this is one of the most carefully considered and thought-out solo systems around.  LINK  

Peninsular War variant for 'The Men Who Would Be Kings'

Reading about the Peninsular War, I had the idea that the “pop-up and slink away” style of Mr. Babbage would suit the ambushing tactics of a guerrilla centric Allied Army. So I wrote these army lists that do not change any base rule, except if you use Lancers (which is optional anyway). Of course, you can play it with a friend if you wish. This is a variant for The Men Who Would Be Kings' by Osprey Wargames. DOWNLOAD HERE